================ @@ -1,7 +1,9 @@ // RUN: %clang_cc1 -fsyntax-only -verify -std=c++11 -Wthread-safety -Wthread-safety-beta -Wno-thread-safety-negative -fcxx-exceptions -DUSE_CAPABILITY=0 %s // RUN: %clang_cc1 -fsyntax-only -verify -std=c++11 -Wthread-safety -Wthread-safety-beta -Wno-thread-safety-negative -fcxx-exceptions -DUSE_CAPABILITY=1 %s +// RUN: %clang_cc1 -fsyntax-only -verify -std=c++11 -Wthread-safety -Wthread-safety-beta -Wno-thread-safety-negative -Wthread-safety-addressof -fcxx-exceptions -DUSE_CAPABILITY=1 -DCHECK_ADDRESSOF %s ---------------- aaronpuchert wrote:
Some goes here: the test is really big and I don't want a combinatorial explosion. We're also having `-beta` on by default, so there is no reason to have `-addressof` separately. (We have `-negative` separately because it's a different kind of analysis.) https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/123063 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
