NagyDonat wrote: > > I completely agree that the message sounds a bit too much like "your code > > is garbage" and that's not very nice. > > Ohh, now I see how this could be interpreted in a negative way. I never > thought of this. > > I like where the discussion is heading with emphasizing the use of > "uninitialized". I also wonder if the sibling checkers of this one also use > this "garbage" wording for their diagnostics. If so, we should also consider > changing those if we are at it.
The message clearly says that the **value** is garbage :roll_eyes: https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/126596 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
