AaronBallman wrote: > Oh, just thought of one more thing: we probably want a c23_compat warning for > this (assuming the language is new in c23).
Good catch -- this is new in C23. C17 said: "Types other than pointer types whose referenced type is an object type shall not be restrict-qualified." So there's two diagnostics needed: one is an `Extension` warning (so it fires in `-pedantic`) for use of an extension pre-C23, and the other is `Warning`, `DefaultIgnore` for code which is incompatible with standards before C23. (And test coverage for both). https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/120896 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
