whisperity wrote: > It feels like instead nlohmann/json should be the one responsible for > providing a "migration path" / tooling for these types of deprecated features. > > Thus I would vote for keeping clang-tidy as a general tool for C++/STL only.
N.B. we already have `abseil-`, `boost-`, `cppcoreguidelines-`, `fuschia-`, `linuxkernel-`, and `zircon-`. https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/126425 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
