================
@@ -1708,19 +1706,9 @@ static void insertDbgValueOrDbgVariableRecord(DIBuilder
&Builder, Value *DV,
static void insertDbgValueOrDbgVariableRecordAfter(
DIBuilder &Builder, Value *DV, DILocalVariable *DIVar, DIExpression
*DIExpr,
- const DebugLoc &NewLoc, BasicBlock::iterator Instr) {
- if (!UseNewDbgInfoFormat) {
- auto DbgVal = Builder.insertDbgValueIntrinsic(DV, DIVar, DIExpr, NewLoc,
- (Instruction *)nullptr);
- cast<Instruction *>(DbgVal)->insertAfter(Instr);
- } else {
- // RemoveDIs: if we're using the new debug-info format, allocate a
- // DbgVariableRecord directly instead of a dbg.value intrinsic.
- ValueAsMetadata *DVAM = ValueAsMetadata::get(DV);
- DbgVariableRecord *DV =
- new DbgVariableRecord(DVAM, DIVar, DIExpr, NewLoc.get());
- Instr->getParent()->insertDbgRecordAfter(DV, &*Instr);
- }
+ const DebugLoc &NewLoc, Instruction *Instr) {
+ insertDbgValueOrDbgVariableRecord(Builder, DV, DIVar, DIExpr, NewLoc,
+ std::next(Instr->getIterator()));
----------------
hvdijk wrote:
I think you're right, thanks, will update and re-test.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/126059
_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
