petrhosek wrote:

> I believe all comments have been addressed. friendly ping. @petrhosek any 
> feedback please?

The high-level comment is that the continuous mode isn't PGO specific, it was 
actually originally developed primarily for coverage, although it can be used 
for PGO as well due to the fact that coverage and PGO share the instrumentation 
and runtime (with the limitation of value profiling not being supported).

I don't think this flag should imply that it's PGO specific by explicitly 
referring to PGO, rather everywhere in your change where you currently say 
"PGO", you should say "profiling" (or "instrumentation profiling") to imply 
that it can be used for both coverage and PGO.

TL;DR `s/PGO/instrumentation profiling/g`

https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/124353
_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits

Reply via email to