jhuber6 wrote: > LGTM syntax-wise. Don't have much of an opinion on the strategy. > > Are there existing users for this? Should we worry about providing backward > compatibility with the "omp" sections in the existing binaries?
That part is fortunately baked-in, as the registration code that's statically linked into the application is the only part that touches the sections. https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/125731 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
