melver wrote: > Doesn't `counted_by` have the same requirements? If not, why does guarded_by?
It does, AFAIK. > Sure, I can imagine where there might be pushback, but perhaps its worthwhile > to see how far you can get with either marking structs that don't need > `-fexperimental-late-parse-attributes`, or propose such member declaration > re-orderings. At least that would let you land something upstream and begin > protecting the kernel/finding bugs. Fair point, in the worst case individual TUs could still add the flag if needed. https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/123063 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
