================
@@ -237,8 +237,17 @@ static_assert(__is_same(decltype(s.t), int));
// explicit deduction guide.
Foo(int) -> Foo<X>;
AFoo s2{i};
-// FIXME: the type should be X because of the above explicit deduction guide.
-static_assert(__is_same(decltype(s2.t), int));
+static_assert(__is_same(decltype(s2.t), X));
+
+
+template<class T>
+using BFoo = AFoo<T>;
+static_assert(__is_same(decltype(BFoo(i).t), X));
+
+
+Foo(double) -> Foo<int>;
+static_assert(__is_same(decltype(AFoo(1.0).t), int));
+static_assert(__is_same(decltype(BFoo(1.0).t), int));
----------------
shafik wrote:
Can we get more complicated test cases, w/ multiple template params and
multiple constructor arguments etc e.g.:
https://compiler-explorer.com/z/x8PhEqWeo
We should really be trying harder to stress test our implementation.
Does it fix this case: https://godbolt.org/z/b84rzhjjK if not we need to open a
bug.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/125478
_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
