yronglin wrote:

> I'm WAY happier with this. I don't have the ability to review the SA stuff 
> well enough to give an approval, but the rest of the stuff is good. 1 Nit, 
> else LGTM.

Thanks for the review! There are no functional changes in Static Analyzer after 
@steakhal's +1 (just renamed a function).

https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/117437
_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits

Reply via email to