MacDue wrote: > Maybe the description here should more explicitly state that it looks for > function pointers as well as functions... > > >
Good idea :+1: I've attempted to clarify what this function does now (in the doc comment). > Probably we should fix the error message not to mention K&R unless we > actually find a K&R-style function type. I agree, but I think that can be done it a later patch. https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/125077 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
