cor3ntin wrote:

> It’d have to be `Impl<Const>::Base::Function(...)` because RAV is only a base 
> class of `Impl` not of DRAV; that would still have a dependent NNS, wouldn’t 
> it?

In the same function then, a statement above

https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/124821
_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits

Reply via email to