cor3ntin wrote: > It’d have to be `Impl<Const>::Base::Function(...)` because RAV is only a base > class of `Impl` not of DRAV; that would still have a dependent NNS, wouldn’t > it?
In the same function then, a statement above https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/124821 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits