bwendling wrote: > I still think we may need to triple check how this extension behaves with > count fields that do not get extended AND are negative at runtime (if we > don't already have tests for that), but perhaps is orthogonal to this initial > refactoring.
I'll look into test cases with negative values. Thanks! https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/122198 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
