berenm added a comment. In https://reviews.llvm.org/D30931#700690, @alexfh wrote:
> I understand your use case, but this patch makes the check's behavior more > confusing: having both "any case" and "ignore case" with subtle differences > in behavior seems very misleading. The problem seems to be coming from the > usage of `CT_AnyCase` to denote uninitialized style. Should we just remove > `NamingStyle::isSet` and use `llvm::Optional<NamingStyle>` instead of > `NamingStyle` where appropriate? I agree https://reviews.llvm.org/D30931 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
