zahiraam wrote:

> Please address @saiislam's questions. I also think that the title and 
> description of the PR should reflect that this PR not only introduces the 6.0 
> flag, but also moves several of the tests to test against 5.1 and 6.0.

I responded to the question.
The changes in the tests are against 6.0 only. I have only added run lines with 
`fopenmp=6.0`.

https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/122108
_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits

Reply via email to