zyn0217 wrote: > There is something generally wrong with type aliases which don't use all of > their parameters, and this needs more thought.
The current approach - bubbling up the containsUnexpanded flag within a transform - is admittedly not ideal. However, it's the only way to make Clang correctly handle nested packs, within lambdas. I remembered @cor3ntin once told me Richard had an idea of completely refactoring the pack model as in https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/issues/9395#issuecomment-980892278. If implemented, we could get rid of this 'workaround'. Maybe we could explore that (probably starting from lambdas?) in the future. https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/122875 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
