Nerixyz wrote: > but I do wonder if this is a part of the compiler that could benefit from > some fuzzing to help shake out parsing issues.
That's probably a good idea. I'm not sure how fuzzing works in Clang. At least having `-Wdocumentation` on while fuzzing would be good (assuming the fuzzer generates comments). --- One thing that's still missing from comment parsing is the ability to skip HTML comments (`<!-- ... -->`). I could make a followup PR for this. https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/120843 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
