AaronBallman wrote: > IN SUMMARY: I think this proposal minus the std check is acceptable.
+1 > I think the proposed-not-implemented warning of "you messed with an attribute > name, and it is doing weird stuff" is also a very valuable, though different, > check. I don't see them as different checks when they warn about the same thing, but I agree they can be separate implementations. I don't have a super strong feeling though because I've not really seen this problem crop up in the wild before except in contrived cases. https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/106036 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
