jdoerfert wrote: > I'm concerned about the soundness of our current implementation for these > assumptions, see my comment at [#120962 > (comment)](https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/120962#issuecomment-2582864870). > Not sure we should be exposing the current implementation from clang.
Let's wait here and move the discussion into the other issue I guess. I replied there too. https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/121789 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
