bjacob wrote: > I didn't really understand the last paragraph of the PR description. How does > using StringRef instead of StringLiteral reduce relocations?
It does not - sorry if that was confusingly worded. What I was trying to say is that using a plain `const char[]` instead of a StringLiteral avoids one relocation. The problem then with StringLiteral is that its existence and name naturally lead people to use it for things that could have been a `const char[]` , resulting in more relocations. Maybe not having a class named `StringLiteral` will result in more string literals remaining `const char[]`. https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/122366 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
