================
@@ -406,7 +406,7 @@ void use() {
strings.insert(strings.begin(), std::string());
std::vector<const std::string*> pointers;
- pointers.push_back(getLifetimeBoundPointer(std::string())); //
expected-warning {{object whose reference is captured by 'pointers' will be
destroyed at the end of the full-expression}}
+ pointers.push_back(getLifetimeBoundPointer(std::string()));
----------------
Xazax-hun wrote:
For a follow-up PR, but I wonder if we can actually get this diagnostic back in
the future. I think in case the pointer originates from a gsl owner, it is a
strong indication that we care about the lifetime of the pointee and not the
pointer itself and the capture_by annotation is what we actually want.
But I am also OK never supporting this scenario as it starts to get a bit
convoluted.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/122240
_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
