cor3ntin wrote: > This does mean that if the preferred and explicit types have different > storage requirements we may not warn in all possible cases, but that's a > scenario for which the warnings are much more complex and confusing
If I understand the patch correctly, we always warn, but about the wrong thing. Should we pick the minimum of both sizes? Should we make it an error for a bit-field to be *larger* than the prefered type? https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/116785 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
