https://github.com/sdesmalen-arm commented:
@NickGuy-Arm this PR is missing some test-coverage. @efriedma-quic do you have any thoughts on emitting the llvm.assume as a prologue to the actual call? I guess the alternative would be to analyse the function to see if there's any calls to streaming-compatible functions, and then emit the llvm.assume in the function's prologue or something, but that would be more work (and I'm not sure if that's worth it). https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/121917 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
