================
@@ -23,28 +23,29 @@ llvm::ArrayRef<DiagnosticRecord>
diagtool::getBuiltinDiagnosticsByName() {
return llvm::ArrayRef(BuiltinDiagnosticsByName);
}
-
// FIXME: Is it worth having two tables, especially when this one can get
// out of sync easily?
+// clang-format off
static const DiagnosticRecord BuiltinDiagnosticsByID[] = {
#define DIAG(ENUM, CLASS, DEFAULT_MAPPING, DESC, GROUP, SFINAE, NOWERROR,
\
SHOWINSYSHEADER, SHOWINSYSMACRO, DEFER, CATEGORY)
\
{#ENUM, diag::ENUM, STR_SIZE(#ENUM, uint8_t)},
#include "clang/Basic/DiagnosticCommonKinds.inc"
-#include "clang/Basic/DiagnosticCrossTUKinds.inc"
#include "clang/Basic/DiagnosticDriverKinds.inc"
#include "clang/Basic/DiagnosticFrontendKinds.inc"
#include "clang/Basic/DiagnosticSerializationKinds.inc"
#include "clang/Basic/DiagnosticLexKinds.inc"
#include "clang/Basic/DiagnosticParseKinds.inc"
#include "clang/Basic/DiagnosticASTKinds.inc"
#include "clang/Basic/DiagnosticCommentKinds.inc"
+#include "clang/Basic/DiagnosticCrossTUKinds.inc"
----------------
cor3ntin wrote:
This seems brittle - Maybe we should call `std::sort` somewhere instead?
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/120321
_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
