carlosgalvezp wrote: > that it is kept for future deprecations (and would therefore need to be > general enough)
Yes, that was my thought, having a general-purpose mechanism for deprecation warnings (a bit what I mentioned in the RFC). Maybe something like `--no-deprecation-warnings` or `--ignore-deprecation-warnings`? > Unless someone is in the position that you've described I believe https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/121057 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
