================
@@ -761,7 +762,37 @@ void StoreDiags::HandleDiagnostic(DiagnosticsEngine::Level
DiagLevel,
return false;
if (!isInsideMainFile(FixIt.RemoveRange.getBegin(), SM))
return false;
- Edits.push_back(toTextEdit(FixIt, SM, *LangOpts));
+
+ auto R = tooling::Replacement(SM, FixIt.RemoveRange, FixIt.CodeToInsert,
+ *LangOpts);
+ auto Err = Replacements->addOrMerge(R);
+ if (Err) {
+ log("Skipping formatting the replacement due to conflict: {0}",
+ llvm::toString(std::move(Err)));
+ Replacements = std::nullopt;
+ break;
+ }
+ }
+
+ llvm::SmallVector<TextEdit, 1> Edits;
+
+ if (Replacements) {
+ StringRef Code = SM.getBufferData(SM.getMainFileID());
+ auto Repl = format::cleanupAroundReplacements(Code, *Replacements,
+ format::getNoStyle());
----------------
llvm-beanz wrote:
nit:
```suggestion
Expected<Replacements> Repl = format::cleanupAroundReplacements(
Code, *Replacements, format::getNoStyle());
```
LLVM's style guide discourages auto when the type isn't clear from context.
see:
https://llvm.org/docs/CodingStandards.html#use-auto-type-deduction-to-make-code-more-readable
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/118569
_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
