dtcxzyw wrote: > I'd have expected the simplest case to be solved suboptimally with a few > range intersections in ValueTracking, but this seems like a nice extension, > if that's the appropriate direction and compile-time acceptable.
This patch increases the compile time by ~0.02%. It should be acceptable. https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/120352 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
