EricWF added a comment. In https://reviews.llvm.org/D30214#690774, @jroelofs wrote:
> In https://reviews.llvm.org/D30214#690375, @Hahnfeld wrote: > > > In https://reviews.llvm.org/D30214#690010, @jroelofs wrote: > > > > > libc++ headers should not be installed in the resource dir. > > > > > > They are currently not by default. But with https://reviews.llvm.org/D30015 > > for runtime libraries, this may become a place for headers packaged with > > the compiler. > > > Note that I didn't say "are not", but rather "should not". > > The only things that should live in the resource dir are things that are tied > to the specific version of the compiler, i.e. sanitizer runtimes, builtins, > and the few compiler-provided headers. Everything else should live in > sysroots/SDKs, and the resource dir is not where those should live. +1. I don't think this is an appropriate place for the headers to live. https://reviews.llvm.org/D30214 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
