mehdi_amini added a comment. In https://reviews.llvm.org/D30514#690702, @jroelofs wrote:
> In https://reviews.llvm.org/D30514#690318, @mehdi_amini wrote: > > > LGTM. > > > > (It seems that having libc++ and libc++abi in the same repo would help > > sharing code like this) > > > I think it would be a step backwards in terms of opening things up for > layering violations. We already have one unavoidable one that comes from they > way typeinfo matching works in ARM EHABI... I'd be afraid of it getting worse. I don't see why: this is about discipline and bots. Enforcing layering using separate repository sounds awful to me. https://reviews.llvm.org/D30514 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
