================
@@ -18,6 +21,87 @@ mlir::MLIRContext &CIRGenTypes::getMLIRContext() const {
return *builder.getContext();
}
+/// Return true if the specified type in a function parameter or result
position
+/// can be converted to a CIR type at this point. This boils down to being
+/// whether it is complete, as well as whether we've temporarily deferred
+/// expanding the type because we're in a recursive context.
+bool CIRGenTypes::isFuncParamTypeConvertible(clang::QualType type) {
+ // Some ABIs cannot have their member pointers represented in LLVM IR unless
+ // certain circumstances have been reached.
+ assert(!type->getAs<MemberPointerType>() && "NYI");
+
+ // If this isn't a tagged type, we can convert it!
----------------
erichkeane wrote:
First, `tag` type, not `tagged` type, as this just represents any of the
struct, class, union, or enum types.
Second, is the rest of this true? Non-Tag types include atomics, Attributed
types, bitint types, block pointers, complex, various dependent types, vector
types, etc. Do we really just mean to do `BuiltinType` here instead? Or do we
really mean we can do the rest already?
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/120484
_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
