phoad107185 wrote: > > I struggle with changes that encourage people to not be fully > > clang-formatted, I would prefer to ask why we need this feature, can we > > have some examples of where this would be used? > > This makes it so only one line isn't formatted instead of the current > solution which is 2 lines unformatted. Additionally, if you start writing > code in between the unformatted region you inherit the unformatted scope. > Being able to disable the formatter for only a single line means the > formatter will be disabled for the shortest amount of code possible.
While I understand the reason I would ask again, what exactly are you disabling on a single line and why? Does the clang-format team really want to maintain more reasons to "not" format code? I would rather put the effort into understanding why you are having to use the // clang-format off in the first place I work on a project (in my day job) with millions of lines of code, EVERY file is 100% clang-formatted, without any // clang-format off statements. When I hit a problem I report it against clang-format or even submit a fix. So again to reiterate my question why do we need this feature? what is the reason and why doesn't the current capabilities support what you need. https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/118566 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
