JonChesterfield wrote:

@b-sumner has useful context on this. I won't paraphrase, but it sounds like 
the block deleted here has the right semantics for opencl, where "seqcst" has 
some special meaning and generally the semantics don't totally make sense to 
me. Suggest we amend this to "if opencl, do this thing, otherwise leave it 
alone"

https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/120095
_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits

Reply via email to