JOE1994 wrote: > I mean, why do we have to watch for type mismatches and fix them instead of > creating the correct type in the first place? There is getPointerType(RetQT) just above, shouldn't it be something like getPointerType(RetQT, <correct address space>)? Or RetQT should have had the correct address space, but for some reason it was lost?
I totally agree with you. I'm unfamiliar with Clang Qualtypes and how clang QualTypes' addrspace info match to llvm types' addrspace info, so I shared a quick dirty fix to at least share a direction. https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/119246 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
