================ @@ -57,6 +57,86 @@ class QCIRVInstRR<bits<5> func5, DAGOperand InTyRs1, string opcodestr> : RVInstR<{0b00, func5}, 0b011, OPC_CUSTOM_0, (outs GPRNoX0:$rd), (ins InTyRs1:$rs1, GPRNoX0:$rs2), opcodestr, "$rd, $rs1, $rs2">; +let hasSideEffects = 0, mayLoad = 0, mayStore = 0 in +class QCISELECTIICC<bits<3> func3, string opcodestr> + : RVInst<(outs GPRNoX0:$rd_wb), (ins GPRNoX0:$rd, GPRNoX0:$rs1, + simm5:$simm5, simm5:$simm), opcodestr, ---------------- topperc wrote:
Can we use `simm1` and `simm2` instead of `simm5` and `simm`? I believe that matches the spec. https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/119504 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits