dwblaikie wrote: No idea if this sufficiently overlaps with, or is orthogonal to the following, but:
Currently we don't scope function-local types into the appropriate scope inside a function. It seems like associating types with their declaration may make this harder to address - how would we handle that? (like, we'd have to create scopes for function declarations? somehow associate those with the scopes in concrete definitions of a function?) Maybe it's too big/complex a problem to try to think about, and incremental development should overrule here - but may be worth thinking about? https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/119001 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
