arsenm wrote: > > This probably should retain separate wave32/wave64 builds. Additionally, > > should have extension points for subtarget specific implementations > > That's what Shilei was talking about since we have `__nvvm_reflect` for that > for NVPTX.
First I will always consider NVVM reflect a giant hack. NVVM reflect cannot actually deal with the full range of wavesize issues. It is an incompatible ABI and the code should never be intermixed https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/119091 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits