efriedma-quic wrote: For reference, the RFC for the LLVM backend was https://discourse.llvm.org/t/rfc-request-for-upstream-tensilica-xtensa-esp32-backend/65355 . Given there's an LLVM backend, I don't think we need a separate clang RFC? Assuming the target doesn't require any exotic frontend features, we'd inevitably reach the same conclusion as the LLVM backend RFC.
That said, I am a little concerned that progress on the upstreaming is moving excessively slowly; it's been over two years since the original RFC. New backends don't normally take that long... what exactly has been happening? https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/118008 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
