================
@@ -9712,19 +9712,34 @@ def warn_operator_new_returns_null : Warning<
"%select{| or 'noexcept'}1">, InGroup<OperatorNewReturnsNull>;
def err_operator_new_dependent_param_type : Error<
- "%0 cannot take a dependent type as first parameter; "
- "use size_t (%1) instead">;
+ "%select{|type aware}1 %0 cannot take a dependent type as
%select{first|second}1 parameter; "
+ "use size_t (%2) instead">;
def err_operator_new_param_type : Error<
- "%0 takes type size_t (%1) as first parameter">;
+ "%select{|type aware}1 %0 takes type size_t (%2) as %select{first|second}1
parameter">;
def err_operator_new_default_arg: Error<
"parameter of %0 cannot have a default argument">;
def err_operator_delete_dependent_param_type : Error<
- "%0 cannot take a dependent type as first parameter; use %1 instead">;
+ "%select{|type aware}1 %0 cannot take a dependent type as
%select{first|second}1 parameter; "
+ "use %2 instead">;
def err_operator_delete_param_type : Error<
- "first parameter of %0 must have type %1">;
+ "%select{first|second}1 parameter of%select{|type aware}1 %0 must have type
%2">;
def err_destroying_operator_delete_not_usual : Error<
"destroying operator delete can have only an optional size and optional "
"alignment parameter">;
+def err_type_aware_destroying_operator_delete : Error<
+ "type aware destroying delete is not permitted, enable with
'-fexperimental-cxx-type-aware-destroying-delete'">;
+def err_unsupported_type_aware_allocator : Error<
+ "type aware allocation operators are disabled, enable with
'-fexperimental-cxx-type-aware-allocators'">;
----------------
cor3ntin wrote:
Are these useful? The option is defaulted to true anyway right? And it's likely
to land in 26 in a few weeks
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/113510
_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
