https://github.com/AaronBallman updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/118800
>From 34d3d3000bc6096bbc9eb35ce85b6ceca50b91ca Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Aaron Ballman <aa...@aaronballman.com>
Date: Thu, 5 Dec 2024 08:31:24 -0500
Subject: [PATCH 1/3] [C++20] Destroying delete and deleted destructors
When a destroying delete overload is selected, the destructor is not
automatically called. Therefore, the destructor can be deleted without
causing the program to be ill-formed.
---
clang/docs/ReleaseNotes.rst | 2 ++
clang/lib/Sema/SemaExprCXX.cpp | 6 +++--
.../CXX/expr/expr.unary/expr.delete/p10.cpp | 22 +++++++++++++++++--
3 files changed, 26 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
diff --git a/clang/docs/ReleaseNotes.rst b/clang/docs/ReleaseNotes.rst
index e484eb7a76e63a..4a72e4046e2d03 100644
--- a/clang/docs/ReleaseNotes.rst
+++ b/clang/docs/ReleaseNotes.rst
@@ -663,6 +663,8 @@ Bug Fixes in This Version
- Fixed a crash when GNU statement expression contains invalid statement
(#GH113468).
- Fixed a failed assertion when using ``__attribute__((noderef))`` on an
``_Atomic``-qualified type (#GH116124).
+- No longer incorrectly diagnosing use of a deleted destructor when the
+ selected overload of ``operator delete`` for that type is a destroying
delete.
Bug Fixes to Compiler Builtins
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
diff --git a/clang/lib/Sema/SemaExprCXX.cpp b/clang/lib/Sema/SemaExprCXX.cpp
index db9ea7fb66e05a..45840dfa31ac92 100644
--- a/clang/lib/Sema/SemaExprCXX.cpp
+++ b/clang/lib/Sema/SemaExprCXX.cpp
@@ -3792,13 +3792,15 @@ Sema::ActOnCXXDelete(SourceLocation StartLoc, bool
UseGlobal,
.HasSizeT;
}
- if (!PointeeRD->hasIrrelevantDestructor())
+ if (!PointeeRD->hasIrrelevantDestructor() &&
+ (!OperatorDelete || !OperatorDelete->isDestroyingOperatorDelete())) {
if (CXXDestructorDecl *Dtor = LookupDestructor(PointeeRD)) {
MarkFunctionReferenced(StartLoc,
- const_cast<CXXDestructorDecl*>(Dtor));
+ const_cast<CXXDestructorDecl *>(Dtor));
if (DiagnoseUseOfDecl(Dtor, StartLoc))
return ExprError();
}
+ }
CheckVirtualDtorCall(PointeeRD->getDestructor(), StartLoc,
/*IsDelete=*/true, /*CallCanBeVirtual=*/true,
diff --git a/clang/test/CXX/expr/expr.unary/expr.delete/p10.cpp
b/clang/test/CXX/expr/expr.unary/expr.delete/p10.cpp
index aad2747dd32f24..b2c0a2c79695fc 100644
--- a/clang/test/CXX/expr/expr.unary/expr.delete/p10.cpp
+++ b/clang/test/CXX/expr/expr.unary/expr.delete/p10.cpp
@@ -1,7 +1,14 @@
-// RUN: %clang_cc1 -std=c++1z -verify %s
+// RUN: %clang_cc1 -std=c++20 -verify %s
using size_t = decltype(sizeof(0));
-namespace std { enum class align_val_t : size_t {}; }
+namespace std {
+ enum class align_val_t : size_t {};
+ struct destroying_delete_t {
+ explicit destroying_delete_t() = default;
+ };
+
+ inline constexpr destroying_delete_t destroying_delete{};
+}
// Aligned version is preferred over unaligned version,
// unsized version is preferred over sized version.
@@ -23,3 +30,14 @@ struct alignas(Align) B {
};
void f(B<__STDCPP_DEFAULT_NEW_ALIGNMENT__> *p) { delete p; }
void f(B<__STDCPP_DEFAULT_NEW_ALIGNMENT__ * 2> *p) { delete p; } //
expected-error {{deleted}}
+
+// Ensure that a deleted destructor is acceptable when the selected overload
+// for operator delete is a destroying delete. See the comments in GH118660.
+struct S {
+ ~S() = delete;
+ void operator delete(S *, std::destroying_delete_t) noexcept {}
+};
+
+void foo(S *s) {
+ delete s; // Was rejected, is intended to be accepted.
+}
>From 133a8aa2934f9d6ed733e74af65180131d59cc91 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Aaron Ballman <aa...@aaronballman.com>
Date: Thu, 5 Dec 2024 10:14:46 -0500
Subject: [PATCH 2/3] Update based on review feedback
* Added a standards reference
* Added a test case
* Fixed an issue the new test case identified
---
clang/lib/Sema/SemaExprCXX.cpp | 13 +++++++++++--
clang/test/CXX/expr/expr.unary/expr.delete/p10.cpp | 10 ++++++++++
2 files changed, 21 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/clang/lib/Sema/SemaExprCXX.cpp b/clang/lib/Sema/SemaExprCXX.cpp
index 45840dfa31ac92..6ac44ae7af28c3 100644
--- a/clang/lib/Sema/SemaExprCXX.cpp
+++ b/clang/lib/Sema/SemaExprCXX.cpp
@@ -3792,6 +3792,14 @@ Sema::ActOnCXXDelete(SourceLocation StartLoc, bool
UseGlobal,
.HasSizeT;
}
+ // C++20 [expr.delete]p6: If the value of the operand of the delete-
+ // expression is not a null pointer value and the selected deallocation
+ // function (see below) is not a destroying operator delete, the delete-
+ // expression will invoke the destructor (if any) for the object or the
+ // elements of the array being deleted.
+ //
+ // This means we should not look at the destructor for a destroying
+ // delete operator, as that destructor is never called.
if (!PointeeRD->hasIrrelevantDestructor() &&
(!OperatorDelete || !OperatorDelete->isDestroyingOperatorDelete())) {
if (CXXDestructorDecl *Dtor = LookupDestructor(PointeeRD)) {
@@ -3831,9 +3839,10 @@ Sema::ActOnCXXDelete(SourceLocation StartLoc, bool
UseGlobal,
MarkFunctionReferenced(StartLoc, OperatorDelete);
// Check access and ambiguity of destructor if we're going to call it.
- // Note that this is required even for a virtual delete.
+ // Note that this is required even for a virtual delete, but not for a
+ // destroying delete operator.
bool IsVirtualDelete = false;
- if (PointeeRD) {
+ if (PointeeRD && !OperatorDelete->isDestroyingOperatorDelete()) {
if (CXXDestructorDecl *Dtor = LookupDestructor(PointeeRD)) {
CheckDestructorAccess(Ex.get()->getExprLoc(), Dtor,
PDiag(diag::err_access_dtor) << PointeeElem);
diff --git a/clang/test/CXX/expr/expr.unary/expr.delete/p10.cpp
b/clang/test/CXX/expr/expr.unary/expr.delete/p10.cpp
index b2c0a2c79695fc..aff3e2b449da37 100644
--- a/clang/test/CXX/expr/expr.unary/expr.delete/p10.cpp
+++ b/clang/test/CXX/expr/expr.unary/expr.delete/p10.cpp
@@ -38,6 +38,16 @@ struct S {
void operator delete(S *, std::destroying_delete_t) noexcept {}
};
+struct T {
+ void operator delete(T *, std::destroying_delete_t) noexcept {}
+private:
+ ~T();
+};
+
void foo(S *s) {
delete s; // Was rejected, is intended to be accepted.
}
+
+void bar(T *t) {
+ delete t; // Was rejected, is intended to be accepted.
+}
>From b42fb1350f95924fae0b5dd7a46d7bc4d46d3d29 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Aaron Ballman <aa...@aaronballman.com>
Date: Thu, 5 Dec 2024 11:58:33 -0500
Subject: [PATCH 3/3] Fix one of the two failing tests, update release notes
It turns out someone filed an issue for this.
---
clang/docs/ReleaseNotes.rst | 3 ++-
clang/test/SemaCXX/cxx2a-destroying-delete.cpp | 12 ++++++------
2 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
diff --git a/clang/docs/ReleaseNotes.rst b/clang/docs/ReleaseNotes.rst
index 4a72e4046e2d03..e6373b165b63df 100644
--- a/clang/docs/ReleaseNotes.rst
+++ b/clang/docs/ReleaseNotes.rst
@@ -664,7 +664,8 @@ Bug Fixes in This Version
- Fixed a failed assertion when using ``__attribute__((noderef))`` on an
``_Atomic``-qualified type (#GH116124).
- No longer incorrectly diagnosing use of a deleted destructor when the
- selected overload of ``operator delete`` for that type is a destroying
delete.
+ selected overload of ``operator delete`` for that type is a destroying delete
+ (#GH46818).
Bug Fixes to Compiler Builtins
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
diff --git a/clang/test/SemaCXX/cxx2a-destroying-delete.cpp
b/clang/test/SemaCXX/cxx2a-destroying-delete.cpp
index 25b985ef11d157..e986c6abfe8cec 100644
--- a/clang/test/SemaCXX/cxx2a-destroying-delete.cpp
+++ b/clang/test/SemaCXX/cxx2a-destroying-delete.cpp
@@ -146,17 +146,17 @@ namespace dtor_access {
struct S {
void operator delete(S *p, std::destroying_delete_t);
private:
- ~S(); // expected-note {{here}}
+ ~S();
};
- // FIXME: PR47474: GCC accepts this, and it seems somewhat reasonable to
- // allow, even though [expr.delete]p12 says this is ill-formed.
- void f() { delete new S; } // expected-error {{calling a private destructor}}
+ // C++20 [expr.delete]p12 says this is ill-formed, but GCC accepts and we
+ // filed CWG2889 to resolve in the same way.
+ void f() { delete new S; }
struct T {
void operator delete(T *, std::destroying_delete_t);
protected:
- virtual ~T(); // expected-note {{here}}
+ virtual ~T();
};
struct U : T {
@@ -165,7 +165,7 @@ namespace dtor_access {
~U() override;
};
- void g() { delete (T *)new U; } // expected-error {{calling a protected
destructor}}
+ void g() { delete (T *)new U; }
}
namespace delete_from_new {
_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
