https://github.com/AaronBallman created
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/118687
Given a `noexcept` operator with an operand that calls `delete`, Clang was not
considering whether the selected `operator delete` function was a destroying
delete or not when inspecting whether the deleted object type has a throwing
destructor. Thus, the operator would return `false` for a type with a
potentially throwing destructor even though that destructor would not be called
due to the destroying delete. Clang now takes the kind of delete operator into
consideration.
Fixes #118660
>From 10985bcd5ae13f4533a9df4fa3035bd49e49af15 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Aaron Ballman <aa...@aaronballman.com>
Date: Wed, 4 Dec 2024 14:31:48 -0500
Subject: [PATCH] [C++20] Deleting destructors can be noexcept
Given a `noexcept` operator with an operand that calls `delete`, Clang
was not considering whether the selected `operator delete` function was
a destroying delete or not when inspecting whether the deleted object
type has a throwing destructor. Thus, the operator would return `false`
for a type with a potentially throwing destructor even though that
destructor would not be called due to the destroying delete. Clang now
takes the kind of delete operator into consideration.
Fixes #118660
---
clang/docs/ReleaseNotes.rst | 3 +++
clang/lib/Sema/SemaExceptionSpec.cpp | 5 +++--
.../SemaCXX/noexcept-destroying-delete.cpp | 21 +++++++++++++++++++
3 files changed, 27 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
create mode 100644 clang/test/SemaCXX/noexcept-destroying-delete.cpp
diff --git a/clang/docs/ReleaseNotes.rst b/clang/docs/ReleaseNotes.rst
index 755418e9550cf4..ea5f8f921c4d31 100644
--- a/clang/docs/ReleaseNotes.rst
+++ b/clang/docs/ReleaseNotes.rst
@@ -654,6 +654,9 @@ Bug Fixes in This Version
- Fixed a crash when GNU statement expression contains invalid statement
(#GH113468).
- Fixed a failed assertion when using ``__attribute__((noderef))`` on an
``_Atomic``-qualified type (#GH116124).
+- No longer return ``false`` for ``noexcept`` expressions involving a
+ ``delete`` which resolves to a destroying delete but the type of the object
+ being deleted as a potentially throwing destructor (#GH118660).
Bug Fixes to Compiler Builtins
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
diff --git a/clang/lib/Sema/SemaExceptionSpec.cpp
b/clang/lib/Sema/SemaExceptionSpec.cpp
index ecfd79a50542c4..3e55e8b3d4d2ee 100644
--- a/clang/lib/Sema/SemaExceptionSpec.cpp
+++ b/clang/lib/Sema/SemaExceptionSpec.cpp
@@ -1205,11 +1205,12 @@ CanThrowResult Sema::canThrow(const Stmt *S) {
if (DTy.isNull() || DTy->isDependentType()) {
CT = CT_Dependent;
} else {
- CT = canCalleeThrow(*this, DE, DE->getOperatorDelete());
+ const FunctionDecl *OperatorDelete = DE->getOperatorDelete();
+ CT = canCalleeThrow(*this, DE, OperatorDelete);
if (const RecordType *RT = DTy->getAs<RecordType>()) {
const CXXRecordDecl *RD = cast<CXXRecordDecl>(RT->getDecl());
const CXXDestructorDecl *DD = RD->getDestructor();
- if (DD)
+ if (DD && !OperatorDelete->isDestroyingOperatorDelete())
CT = mergeCanThrow(CT, canCalleeThrow(*this, DE, DD));
}
if (CT == CT_Can)
diff --git a/clang/test/SemaCXX/noexcept-destroying-delete.cpp
b/clang/test/SemaCXX/noexcept-destroying-delete.cpp
new file mode 100644
index 00000000000000..6a0902bfc01467
--- /dev/null
+++ b/clang/test/SemaCXX/noexcept-destroying-delete.cpp
@@ -0,0 +1,21 @@
+// RUN: %clang_cc1 -fsyntax-only -verify -fcxx-exceptions
-Wno-unevaluated-expression -std=c++20 %s
+// expected-no-diagnostics
+
+namespace std {
+ struct destroying_delete_t {
+ explicit destroying_delete_t() = default;
+ };
+
+ inline constexpr destroying_delete_t destroying_delete{};
+}
+
+struct Explicit {
+ ~Explicit() noexcept(false) {}
+
+ void operator delete(Explicit*, std::destroying_delete_t) noexcept {
+ }
+};
+
+Explicit *qn = nullptr;
+// This assertion used to fail, see GH118660
+static_assert(noexcept(delete(qn)));
_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
