================
@@ -3703,8 +3703,14 @@ void Parser::ParseDeclarationSpecifiers(
// We reject AT_LifetimeBound and AT_AnyX86NoCfCheck, even though
they
// are type attributes, because we historically haven't allowed these
// to be used as type attributes in C++11 / C23 syntax.
- if (PA.isTypeAttr() && PA.getKind() != ParsedAttr::AT_LifetimeBound
&&
- PA.getKind() != ParsedAttr::AT_AnyX86NoCfCheck)
+ if (PA.getKind() == ParsedAttr::AT_LifetimeBound) {
+ Diag(PA.getLoc(), diag::err_attribute_wrong_decl_type_str)
+ << PA << PA.isRegularKeywordAttribute()
+ << "parameters and implicit object parameters";
----------------
cor3ntin wrote:
Why are we not using %select for that?
Beside, is "implicit object parameters" sufficiently understandable? - or
should we say "member functions"?
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/118567
_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
