arsenm wrote: > We will want to add more handling than that in the future but it is not > going to be soon. Very likely the additional handling will be for special > cases where the `size_t num` parameter to `memcmp` is known at compile time. > I wanted to add the intrinsic so that the backend knows that is isn't just > looking at a regular function call where the function happened to be called > `memcmp` but an actual call to THE `memcmp`.
You can always do libcall recognition, you don't need an intrinsic to optimize them https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/118178 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
