================
@@ -5347,13 +5347,16 @@ static TypeSourceInfo
*GetFullTypeForDeclarator(TypeProcessingState &state,
case NestedNameSpecifier::TypeSpec:
case NestedNameSpecifier::TypeSpecWithTemplate:
- ClsType = QualType(NNS->getAsType(), 0);
+ const Type *NNSType = NNS->getAsType();
+ ClsType = QualType(NNSType, 0);
// Note: if the NNS has a prefix and ClsType is a nondependent
- // TemplateSpecializationType, then the NNS prefix is NOT included
- // in ClsType; hence we wrap ClsType into an ElaboratedType.
- // NOTE: in particular, no wrap occurs if ClsType already is an
- // Elaborated, DependentName, or DependentTemplateSpecialization.
- if (isa<TemplateSpecializationType>(NNS->getAsType()))
+ // TemplateSpecializationType or a RecordType, then the NNS prefix is
+ // NOT included in ClsType; hence we wrap ClsType into an
+ // ElaboratedType. NOTE: in particular, no wrap occurs if ClsType
+ // already is an Elaborated, DependentName, or
+ // DependentTemplateSpecialization.
+ if (isa<TemplateSpecializationType>(NNSType) ||
+ (NNSPrefix && isa<RecordType>(NNSType)))
----------------
mizvekov wrote:
```suggestion
isa<RecordType>(NNSType))
```
We use an ElaboratedType with null prefix to represent a type which was written
without qualifiers, so it seems arbitrary to not add the elaboration in this
case.
Also, can you at least add a FIXME / TODO explaining how a
DependentTemplateSpecializationType needs to be handled here, as I explained in
the other thread?
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/118236
_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
