arichardson wrote: > Hi @arichardson. > > Thanks for this change. Acc to the doc which I have `The char type is > unsigned by default for Xtensa processors.` Our GCC Xtensa toolchain also > interprets char type as unsigned by default.
Thanks, do you believe we need a backwards compatibility flag for the ABI to be consistent with older clang or is this safe to land? https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/115967 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
