================
@@ -121,6 +121,16 @@ int NegativeShortTest[NegativeShort == -1 ? 1 : -1];
enum Color { Red, Green, Blue }; // expected-note{{previous use is here}}
typedef struct Color NewColor; // expected-error {{use of 'Color' with tag
type that does not match previous declaration}}
+// Enumerations with a fixed underlying type.
+// https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/issues/116880
+#if __STDC_VERSION__ >= 202311L && !__has_feature(c_fixed_enum)
+ #error c_fixed_enum should be set a feature in C23 mode
+#elif __STDC_VERSION__ < 202311L && !__has_extension(c_fixed_enum)
+ #error c_fixed_enum should be a language extension in <C23 mode
+#else
+ typedef enum : unsigned char { Pink, Black, Cyan } Color; //
pre-c23-warning {{enumeration types with a fixed underlying type are a C23
extension}}
+#endif
----------------
AidanGoldfarb wrote:
Updated. I chose to include
`typedef enum : unsigned char { Pink, Black, Cyan } Color; // pre-c23-warning
{{enumeration types with a fixed underlying type are a C23 extension}}`
in `enum.c`, as I think we want to test for both the behavior of
`__has_feature()` and `__has_extension()` as well as the actual definition of a
typed enum. Please let me know if this is not a good idea!
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/117507
_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
