usx95 wrote:

>  We could potentially limit the suppression to cases where the destructor is 
> trivial, but that might not be worth the added complexity.
I agree that might not be worth the complexity. Let's revisit if we have 
practical false positives.

Thanks for the tests. LGTM.

https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/117733
_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits

Reply via email to