Timm =?utf-8?q?Bäder?= <tbae...@redhat.com>
Message-ID:
In-Reply-To: <llvm.org/llvm/llvm-project/pull/117...@github.com>


AaronBallman wrote:

> but this is not a bug introduced by the changes, rather, the newly supplied 
> (valid!) source ranges now get taken into account in 
> `checkRangesForMacroArgExpansion()` in `Frontend/DiagnosticRenderer.cpp`.

Yeah, I think we need to solve that before moving forward with the changes, 
which is why this keeps not being improved. (It always seems to come back to 
bite us when we decide that invalid source locations are an in-band indicator 
of anything.)

https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/117671
_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits

Reply via email to