================
@@ -1700,6 +1700,7 @@ declToHierarchyItem(const NamedDecl &ND, llvm::StringRef
TUPath) {
HierarchyItem HI;
HI.name = printName(Ctx, ND);
+ // FIXME: Populate HI.detail the way we do in symbolToHierarchyItem?
----------------
i-garrison wrote:
I see. Ideally there should be some recommended use model for `c++` which call
hierarchy clients/visualisers (e.g. lsp4e) could implement to show expected
function signatures. Like "obtain details field from call hierarchy item and
use it as function signature" and then lsp4e could append details to name. We
probably can later tune xrefs.cpp implementation to provide required details
where needed. Note that function return value is still not available, and as
far as I can see there is no place in protocol to put it in.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/77556
_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
