================
@@ -1103,7 +1103,15 @@ static void InitializePredefinedMacros(const TargetInfo
&TI,
assert(TI.getCharWidth() == 8 && "Only support 8-bit char so far");
Builder.defineMacro("__CHAR_BIT__", Twine(TI.getCharWidth()));
- Builder.defineMacro("__BOOL_WIDTH__", Twine(TI.getBoolWidth()));
+ // The macro is specifying the number of bits in the value representation,
+ // not the number of bits in the object representation, which is what
+ // getBoolWidth() will return. For the bool/_Bool data type, there is only
----------------
jrtc27 wrote:
Hm, I guess in an ideal world we'd have getTypeObjectWidth and
getTypeValueWidth to avoid assuming they're the same or, in this case,
hard-coding 1, but if this is the only case where we need anything different
from what we have today then that would be a bit overkill.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/117364
_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
