preames wrote: > I am not sue about the acceptance of the "tt" naming here given we use full > names for all other vendors in this context. Can you raise that point > specifically at the next RISCV sync up call for discussion?
Just to close the loop. We did briefly touch on this in the sync up call. The basic consensus is that processor names are set by vendors, not by us as a project. For commercial implementations, we'll take anything which is reasonable and supported by public material. For non-commercial implementations, we may be stricter on naming - just to avoid polluting global namespace with designs which don't have wide adoption. Basically, we'll revisit on a case by case basis as needed. https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/115100 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
